How much we save universities
Universities save up to 80% on grading costs while improving consistency and speed across departments



80% Cost Reduction
Universities save on grading labor costs annually
Universities save up to 80% on grading costs while improving consistency and speed across departments



80% Cost Reduction
Universities save on grading labor costs annually
Streamlined assessment workflows that reduce administrative overhead and improve faculty productivity
80%
80% time saved
Track and analyze how universities benefit from automated grading and assessment solutions



Trusted by 1k+
Automated Extraction
Instantly converts scanned exam papers into structured digital data. Our AI automatically identifies and maps student information, question numbers, and answer regions. No manual setup required.
30+ Languages
Arabic, Chinese, German & more
Compare & Validate
Complete control over results
Understands Every Answer
Intelligently processes diverse answer formats from handwritten essays to diagrams and mathematical equations. Adapts to any exam layout while maintaining accuracy across question types.
From handwritten essays to digital quizzes, GradeLab handles it all with the same precision and speed.

.png&w=640&q=75)



Everything you need to automate grading with AI accuracy and teacher control.
Grade 200 handwritten exams in under 30 minutes. What takes 4 hours manually now takes 20 minutes with AI.
99%+ accuracy in reading handwritten answers across all subjects. Trained on millions of real student exams.
On-premise deployment keeps your exam data secure within your institution. Zero cloud dependency.
Grade essays, math problems, diagrams, MCQs, and mixed formats. Supports 30+ languages including Arabic and Chinese.
Review and adjust any AI grade with one click. You stay in control while AI handles the heavy lifting.
See class performance, question difficulty, and student progress the moment grading completes. Spot trends instantly.
You have 300 papers, 3 days, and 2 co-graders. One grader is strict about units, the other is not. Nobody can remember what was decided on question 7 three days ago. And when a student challenges a mark, you need to reconstruct the reasoning from margin notes written at midnight.
By paper 100, you are tired. By paper 200, you are skimming. By paper 300, you wonder if the students at the end of the pile are getting the same version of you as the students at the start. And when another grader marked the same question on a different paper, you wonder if they applied the rubric the same way you did. You probably did not. Nobody does. Not by paper 300.
Then a student files an appeal. You need to explain why you deducted two marks on question 4b of paper 187. You pull out the paper, look at your handwriting in the margin, and try to remember what you were thinking at 11 PM three days ago. If you are honest, you cannot always remember.
Exam grading software is not a luxury during exam season. It is how you keep your sanity. GradeLab coordinates multiple graders, applies the same rubric on every paper, flags inconsistencies between graders, and keeps a full audit trail of every decision. You can add custom instructions so the AI grades the way your exam board would, and it applies your rules consistently, whether it is paper 1 or paper 300.
Exam grading software is a platform that brings your entire exam grading workflow into one place. You upload papers, assign them to graders, apply the same rubric on every paper, flag inconsistencies between graders, and keep a full audit trail of every decision. The AI reads the answers, suggests marks with visible reasoning, and flags the ones it is unsure about for your review.
GradeLab lets you add custom instructions so the AI grades the way you would. Tell it to award method marks even if the final answer is wrong. Tell it to deduct for missing units in physics. Tell it to accept two different approaches for the same problem. The AI applies your instructions on every paper, the same way, every time. No fatigue. No drift. No "I marked the first ten strictly and then started being lenient."
When a student challenges a mark, the original answer, the applied rubric, the AI reasoning, the grader who made the call, and any override are all visible. Export it as a report for the appeals committee. The audit trail is not a nice-to-have during exam season. It is the difference between a defensible result and a guess.
Everything you need to coordinate graders, apply rubrics consistently, flag inconsistencies, and keep a full audit trail from the first paper to the last.
Watch how AI grading and online assessment work end-to-end, from upload to results.
GradeLab is not just a tool that scores papers. It coordinates graders, enforces consistency, flags problems, and keeps a record so every decision is defensible.
Assign papers to graders, track progress in real time, and make sure every grader works from the same rubric. No more "who marked question 7?"
Upload your mark scheme once. Add custom instructions in plain English. GradeLab applies them on paper 1 and paper 300 the same way. No drift, no fatigue, no inconsistency.
When two graders mark the same question differently, GradeLab surfaces the discrepancy for moderation. Standardise before results go out, not after a student complains.
Upload scanned papers or digital submissions. OCR reads the handwriting, maps answers to questions, and gets every response ready for grading.
A student who set up the equation right but made an arithmetic mistake deserves method marks. GradeLab evaluates each step and awards credit where it is earned.
Every decision is recorded: the original answer, the rubric, the AI reasoning, the grader, the override, and the final mark. Export it for appeals or accreditation reviews.
Upload an entire exam sitting. 30 papers, 100 papers, 500 papers. Track progress in real time and get suggested marks back for review.
When a student applies for re-evaluation, you do not need to re-mark the paper from scratch. The original marking, rubric, and reasoning are all there. You review the disputed question and decide.
GradeLab suggests. You decide. Override any mark, rewrite any feedback, add your own notes. Nothing reaches a student until you have approved it.
Explore our AI grading platform, compare AI exam marking workflows, or learn about our AI grading system for institutions.

GradeLab
AI + Teacher Control
See the feature differences between GradeLab, manual exam grading, and other exam software for exam season.

GradeLab
Best for institutions
Multi-Grader Coordination
Handwriting OCR
Custom Instructions
Teacher Override
Audit Trail
Step-Wise Marks
Batch Processing
Re-Evaluation Export
Governments, institutions, and AI ecosystems worldwide. Delivering secure, scalable, and accurate handwritten assessment solutions.

Official assessment workflows for certified exam bodies and large-scale handwritten examinations.
.30c80c0c.png&w=1920&q=75)
Enterprise-grade AI grading deployed for national-level academic and workforce assessments.

Fine-tuned OCR and grading models built specifically for real-world exam handwriting.
From paper pile to approved results with a full audit trail
Upload scanned handwritten papers, phone photos, or digital submissions. GradeLab organises pages, identifies questions, and prepares every response for grading. Assign papers to graders or let the system distribute them.
Upload your official mark scheme. Add custom instructions in plain English: how strict to be on units, what to accept, what to penalise. Every grader works from the same rubric, applied the same way, on every paper.
GradeLab suggests marks with visible reasoning and flags answers where graders disagree. Low-confidence answers are routed to a review queue. You see the original answer, the rubric, and the reasoning before you make a call.
Override any mark, add comments, and approve. Release question-level feedback to students. Export the full audit trail, every decision, every override, every reasoning, as a report for appeals or accreditation.
Exam grading software is the system your institution uses to grade exams at scale. It coordinates multiple graders, applies the same rubric on every paper, flags inconsistencies, and keeps a full audit trail. GradeLab is exam grading software with AI built in, so you get automation and human review in the same system.
Yes. GradeLab assigns scripts to different graders, applies the same rubric on every paper, and surfaces discrepancies for moderation. When a student challenges a result, every decision is visible: who marked it, what rubric was applied, and what was overridden.
Yes. Every decision is recorded: the original answer, the applied rubric, the AI reasoning, your override, and the final mark. When a student files for re-evaluation, you do not need to re-mark the paper from scratch. You review the disputed question and make a decision. Export the full marking rationale as a report for the appeals committee.
Yes. You write your rules in plain English and GradeLab follows them on every paper. For example: "accept both method A and method B for question 7" or "deduct one mark if the student did not label diagram axes." The AI applies your instructions consistently across every paper in the batch.
Yes. Upload scanned answer sheets or phone photos. GradeLab reads the handwriting using OCR, maps each answer to the correct question, applies your marking scheme, and suggests marks. You review and approve before results go out.
A batch of 200 exam papers comes back with suggested marks in under 10 minutes. You then review the flagged answers, approve the results, and release feedback. For many institutions, this means results go out the same day the exam was given.
Thomas Braun
Lecturer, Pure Mathematics, Germany
My students write formal mathematical proofs. On a convergence proof question, GradeLab correctly identified whether the quantifier structure was right, whether the chosen bound worked, and where the logical chain broke. It did not just check the final line. That is the part that matters.
Dr. Isabelle Fontaine
Associate Professor, Theoretical Physics, France
GradeLab evaluated a wavefunction normalisation problem across 140 papers and correctly flagged eleven cases where students had a correct final integral but had used the wrong boundary condition. That is precise, subject-aware marking.
Prof. James Fletcher
Mechanical Engineering, Thermodynamics, USA
GradeLab evaluated a question on entropy generation in a throttling process and correctly identified which students had omitted the system definition, which had applied the steady-flow energy equation incorrectly, and which had confused entropy change with entropy generation. That distinction matters in this subject and it caught it reliably.
Thomas Braun
Lecturer, Pure Mathematics, Germany
My students write formal mathematical proofs. On a convergence proof question, GradeLab correctly identified whether the quantifier structure was right, whether the chosen bound worked, and where the logical chain broke. It did not just check the final line. That is the part that matters.
Dr. Isabelle Fontaine
Associate Professor, Theoretical Physics, France
GradeLab evaluated a wavefunction normalisation problem across 140 papers and correctly flagged eleven cases where students had a correct final integral but had used the wrong boundary condition. That is precise, subject-aware marking.
Prof. James Fletcher
Mechanical Engineering, Thermodynamics, USA
GradeLab evaluated a question on entropy generation in a throttling process and correctly identified which students had omitted the system definition, which had applied the steady-flow energy equation incorrectly, and which had confused entropy change with entropy generation. That distinction matters in this subject and it caught it reliably.
Sophie Laurent
Science Teacher, Lycée Henri IV, Paris
Before GradeLab, I spent every Sunday grading papers instead of being with my family. Now I upload the batch on Friday evening and by Saturday morning, every student has already seen their feedback. That part still surprises me.
Maria Santos
Teacher, Escola Internacional de Lisboa
I teach four classes with 35 students each. I genuinely could not keep up with grading. GradeLab didn't just save me time - it gave me back the ability to actually know where each student was struggling.
Sarah Mitchell
Head of Academics, Wellington Grammar School
We trialled several edtech platforms before GradeLab. What stood out was that it wasn't just grading software - the student feedback loop was instant, and the quality reports for governors were exactly what we needed.
Sophie Laurent
Science Teacher, Lycée Henri IV, Paris
Before GradeLab, I spent every Sunday grading papers instead of being with my family. Now I upload the batch on Friday evening and by Saturday morning, every student has already seen their feedback. That part still surprises me.
Maria Santos
Teacher, Escola Internacional de Lisboa
I teach four classes with 35 students each. I genuinely could not keep up with grading. GradeLab didn't just save me time - it gave me back the ability to actually know where each student was struggling.
Sarah Mitchell
Head of Academics, Wellington Grammar School
We trialled several edtech platforms before GradeLab. What stood out was that it wasn't just grading software - the student feedback loop was instant, and the quality reports for governors were exactly what we needed.