Scale assessment across
your university
Fragmented grading across your departments wastes your resources and creates inconsistency. You unify your entire institution from engineering to humanities with standardized evaluation, department dashboards, and complete LMS integration. Reduce your grading labor costs by 80%.
Request University DemoReduce grading labor costs by 80% across departments
Active Queue
Export
Trusted by leading institutions
.png&w=640&q=75)
See GradeLab in action
Watch how AI grading and online assessment work end-to-end, from upload to results.
Powering Assessment for
Governments, institutions, and AI ecosystems worldwide. Delivering secure, scalable, and accurate handwritten assessment solutions.
Government-Certified AI Handwritten Evaluation
Official assessment workflows for certified exam bodies and large-scale handwritten examinations.
.30c80c0c.png&w=1920&q=75)
Enterprise Public Sector AI Grading Systems
Enterprise-grade AI grading deployed for national-level academic and workforce assessments.
Custom AI Grading & OCR Infrastructure
Fine-tuned OCR and grading models built specifically for real-world exam handwriting.
University Implementation
Phased rollout for minimal disruption.
1
Pilot Department
Start with one department, prove ROI, build champions.
2
LMS Integration
Connect to Canvas, Moodle, or your existing systems.
3
Faculty Training
Train department coordinators who cascade to faculty.
4
Institution-Wide Rollout
Expand across departments with proven playbook.
University Solution FAQ
How does GradeLab handle grading across multiple university departments?
GradeLab provides department-level dashboards where each department head can monitor grading progress, consistency, and quality. Faculty maintain autonomy over their classes while administrators get institution-wide visibility. Perfect for universities with diverse departments from engineering to humanities.
Can GradeLab integrate with our existing LMS (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard)?
Yes! GradeLab offers deep integration with Canvas, Moodle, Google Classroom, and Blackboard. Grades sync automatically, student rosters import seamlessly, and faculty can access GradeLab directly from their LMS dashboard. No duplicate data entry required.
How does GradeLab ensure academic integrity in university assessments?
GradeLab includes plagiarism detection, similarity checking, and comprehensive audit trails. All grading actions are logged, rubrics are applied consistently, and administrators can review flagged submissions. This ensures fair evaluation and maintains academic standards across your institution.
What support does GradeLab provide for large-scale university implementation?
GradeLab offers enterprise support including dedicated account managers, 24/7 technical support, faculty training programs, and phased rollout assistance. We work with your IT and academic teams to ensure smooth adoption across departments with minimal disruption to existing workflows.
How does GradeLab reduce grading costs for universities?
By automating 80% of grading time, universities reduce reliance on teaching assistants and part-time graders. A university grading 10,000 papers/month might spend $50,000 on manual grading. With GradeLab, that cost drops to $10,000-15,000 while improving consistency and speed. ROI is typically 300-500% annually.
Trusted by universities across disciplines
Dr. Isabelle Fontaine
Associate Professor, Theoretical Physics, France
GradeLab evaluated a wavefunction normalisation problem across 140 papers and correctly flagged eleven cases where students had a correct final integral but had used the wrong boundary condition. That is precise, subject-aware marking.
Claudia Renner
Senior Accounting Lecturer, Austria
I tested GradeLab on a full consolidation question worth 25 marks. It traced each error to its source, awarded marks where the method was right despite a downstream computational mistake, and produced a per-step breakdown I could hand directly to the student. No human marker I have worked with has been that systematic.
Dr. Sarah Whitmore
Pathology Department, UK
GradeLab evaluated whether students had correctly prioritised multiple myeloma as the primary differential, listed appropriate investigations, and justified their reasoning. It was more consistent than junior examiners.
Dr. Yuki Tanaka
Computational Linguistics, Japan
On a parsing question where students had to produce the correct PS-tree for a centre-embedded relative clause, GradeLab identified incorrect attachment points, missing traces, and wrong phrase labels with a level of accuracy I could not immediately fault. I am now running a formal comparison study.
Dr. Isabelle Fontaine
Associate Professor, Theoretical Physics, France
GradeLab evaluated a wavefunction normalisation problem across 140 papers and correctly flagged eleven cases where students had a correct final integral but had used the wrong boundary condition. That is precise, subject-aware marking.
Claudia Renner
Senior Accounting Lecturer, Austria
I tested GradeLab on a full consolidation question worth 25 marks. It traced each error to its source, awarded marks where the method was right despite a downstream computational mistake, and produced a per-step breakdown I could hand directly to the student. No human marker I have worked with has been that systematic.
Dr. Sarah Whitmore
Pathology Department, UK
GradeLab evaluated whether students had correctly prioritised multiple myeloma as the primary differential, listed appropriate investigations, and justified their reasoning. It was more consistent than junior examiners.
Dr. Yuki Tanaka
Computational Linguistics, Japan
On a parsing question where students had to produce the correct PS-tree for a centre-embedded relative clause, GradeLab identified incorrect attachment points, missing traces, and wrong phrase labels with a level of accuracy I could not immediately fault. I am now running a formal comparison study.
Sophie Laurent
Science Teacher, Lycée Henri IV, Paris
Before GradeLab, I spent every Sunday grading papers instead of being with my family. Now I upload the batch on Friday evening and by Saturday morning, every student has already seen their feedback. That part still surprises me.
Maria Santos
Teacher, Escola Internacional de Lisboa
I teach four classes with 35 students each. I genuinely could not keep up with grading. GradeLab didn't just save me time - it gave me back the ability to actually know where each student was struggling.
James Eriksson
Director, Nordic Learning Centre, Stockholm
We run a centre with 400 students preparing for university entrance exams. The volume of grading was unsustainable. GradeLab handled our entire mock exam cycle - 400 papers graded, scored, and pushed to students in one night.
Sarah Mitchell
Head of Academics, Wellington Grammar School
We trialled several edtech platforms before GradeLab. What stood out was that it wasn't just grading software - the student feedback loop was instant, and the quality reports for governors were exactly what we needed.
Prof. Clerk Anderson
Controller of Examinations, University of Edinburgh
At the university level, consistency in marking is a compliance issue, not just a quality one. GradeLab's audit trail and standardised scoring gave us exactly the documentation we needed for our accreditation review.
Sophie Laurent
Science Teacher, Lycée Henri IV, Paris
Before GradeLab, I spent every Sunday grading papers instead of being with my family. Now I upload the batch on Friday evening and by Saturday morning, every student has already seen their feedback. That part still surprises me.
Maria Santos
Teacher, Escola Internacional de Lisboa
I teach four classes with 35 students each. I genuinely could not keep up with grading. GradeLab didn't just save me time - it gave me back the ability to actually know where each student was struggling.
James Eriksson
Director, Nordic Learning Centre, Stockholm
We run a centre with 400 students preparing for university entrance exams. The volume of grading was unsustainable. GradeLab handled our entire mock exam cycle - 400 papers graded, scored, and pushed to students in one night.
Sarah Mitchell
Head of Academics, Wellington Grammar School
We trialled several edtech platforms before GradeLab. What stood out was that it wasn't just grading software - the student feedback loop was instant, and the quality reports for governors were exactly what we needed.
Prof. Clerk Anderson
Controller of Examinations, University of Edinburgh
At the university level, consistency in marking is a compliance issue, not just a quality one. GradeLab's audit trail and standardised scoring gave us exactly the documentation we needed for our accreditation review.